Percutaneous coronary intervention: assessing coronary vascular risk associated with bare-metal and drug-eluting stents.

نویسنده

  • Sarah A Spinler
چکیده

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting is increasingly being utilized for acute coronary syndromes (ACS), and the debate over the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DESs) versus bare-metal stents (BMSs) has intensified. The difficulty in consistently assessing stent safety is because of the widespread off-label use in patients with clinical features and coronary anatomy inconsistent with the approved use in stable patients with relatively noncomplex coronary stenosis, short-term follow-up of only 1 year in pivotal clinical trials that leads to approval, and inconsistency in the nature and duration of adjunctive antiplatelet therapy. Of concern are the high recurrence rates after the first episode of stent thrombosis, as demonstrated by the Dutch Stent Thrombosis Study. However, more recent analyses using better statistical models favor DESs versus BMSs, both for survival and repeat revascularizations. Recommendations from updated guidelines from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions are summarized for oral antiplatelet therapy with DESs and BMSs in the management of ACS. For patients undergoing elective PCI, dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is recommended for at least 4 weeks for a BMS and 12 months for a DES, with aspirin continued indefinitely. For patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, dual antiplatelet therapy is recommended for at least 12 months. In summary, more recent data suggest that the benefits outweigh the risks of DESs compared with BMSs, and that the rate of DES placement will continue to rise. It is important that clinicians be aware of the indications for dual antiplatelet therapy and the appropriate durations of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing PCI.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A comparison of bare-metal and drug-eluting stents for off-label indications.

BACKGROUND Recent reports suggest that off-label use of drug-eluting stents is associated with an increased incidence of adverse events. Whether the use of bare-metal stents would yield different results is unknown. METHODS We analyzed data from 6551 patients in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry according to whether they were treated with drug-eluting stents or ba...

متن کامل

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: a Hong Kong experience.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the intermediate-term outcomes of patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis who were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention in Hong Kong. DESIGN Historical cohort. SETTING A regional hospital in Hong Kong. PATIENTS Patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease undergoing stenting with bare-metal stents or drug-eluting stents ...

متن کامل

Outcomes following coronary stenting in the era of bare-metal vs the era of drug-eluting stents.

CONTEXT Although drug-eluting stents reduce restenosis rates relative to bare-metal stents, concerns have been raised that drug-eluting stents may also be associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis. Our study focused on the effect of stent type on population-based interventional outcomes. OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes of Medicare beneficiaries who underwent nonemergent coronary ste...

متن کامل

Drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in percutaneous coronary interventions (a meta-analysis).

This meta-analysis combined the results of randomized clinical trials to compare the efficacy of drug-eluting stents with that of bare metal stents in percutaneous coronary interventions to ascertain which revascularization strategy is most safe and effective. The literature identified 13 published studies, and 8 were included in the main meta-analysis, thus allowing a meta-analysis on 3,860 pa...

متن کامل

Interventional Cardiology Predicting the Restenosis Benefit of Drug-Eluting Versus Bare Metal Stents in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background—Drug-eluting stents (DES) for percutaneous coronary intervention decrease the risk of restenosis compared with bare metal stents. However, they are costlier, require prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy, and provide the most benefit in patients at highest risk for restenosis. To assist physicians in targeting DES use in patients at the highest risk for target vessel revascularization ...

متن کامل

Vascular responses to percutaneous coronary intervention with bare-metal stents and drug-eluting stents: a perspective based on insights from pathological and clinical studies.

The era of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has led to substantial changes in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes and stable coronary heart disease, with an associated range of impacts on the course and outcomes of subsets of patients with these conditions. Interventional cardiology has moved from percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), with or withou...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The American journal of managed care

دوره 15 2 Suppl  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009